Search This Blog

Monday, September 4, 2017

Activity Summary Report 07-08/2017 - "No Radiation For you" - www.norad4u.com

Activity Summary Report 07-08/2017

"No Radiation For you"



Hello readers, activists and EHS people.
Please see below the summary report of my activities in the sites and blogs I manage in the fields or EMF and EHS.

Main events in last month


English blog - http://norad4u.blogspot.co.il/ (since 2008)

New posts



Statistics
08/2017 - More than 1875 views


Main site -www.norad4u.com (since 2010)

New pages

  1. No new pages

Pages that were updated

  1. Studies about EHS - update and details about a new EHS exposure study  
  2. Low EMF house design - Phases miss balance -  

Statistics :

07/2017- 2618 visits, 3836 pageviews
08/2017- 2893 visits, 4334 pageviews

For EHS By EHS site – www.4EHSByEHS.com (since 2012)

This site offers special items for EHS people that will enable them to improve their quality of life.

New Pages:

Page that were updated:

  1. DELIVERY SYSTEM - more info about ECO POST option
  2. Minor updates and changes
  3. Inventory updates
  4. Share buttons were moved to the upper part of each page.


Statistics

07/2017- 1051 visits, 2968 pageviews
08/2017- 1075 visits, 2732 pageviews

YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/NoRadBlog (since 2009)

New clips

  1. One video in Hebrew - https://youtu.be/ipxGsctYEEM

Statistics

07/2017 - 7498 views in all videos
08/2017 - 8233 views in all videos.


Hebrew info site – www.Norad4u.co.il (since 2010)

  • 3 new pages
  • 7 pages were updated

Statistics

06/2017 - 5915 visits, 9629 Pageviews
06/2017 - 4520 visits, 7237 Pageviews

Hebrew eStore site – www.4EHSByEHS.co.il (since 2013)

New Hebrew site was created for the eStore.
  • 1  new pages were created
  • 1 page was updated

Statistics

07/2017 - 770 visits, 1643 Pageviews
08/2017 - 582 visits, 1240 Pageviews

Hebrew blog - http://norad4uh.blogspot.co.il/  (since 2006)

The hebrew blog was moved to  a new platform, from Tapuz to Blogger.
  • 20 new posts


Views:
07/2017 -New Blog more than 1376,  Old Block - more than 1329 views
08/2017 -New Blog more than 1348,  Old Block - more than 1000 views

The End!
Thanks for reading and see you next time!
Amir Borenstein

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Cellphones are back in to the Israeli education system

Few months back Cellphone use was banded in schools by the ministry of education.
This was done according to several CEO memos and press releases.
Sadly, this week cellphones were reentered to the Israeli education system by a report of a comity  that allow the use of cellphones (smart phones) for educational needs according to some limitation.

Followed is the text from the nana10.co.il news website, translated to English by google translator:

Under limitations: The Ministry of Education returns the smartphones to classrooms

In Israel

The new school year will open in a few days, and the Ministry of Education intends to allow students to use cell phones during classes - but not fully. According to a committee of the Ministry of Education, students will be able to use the phones in flight mode or that every three students will use one cell phone.

T

he Ministry of Education will approve the use of smartphones as study aids, as opposed to the decision made last year.


Education Minister Naftali Bennett and his ministry's director general, Shmuel Abuav, wanted to return the use of smart phones to classrooms, but a special committee was set up to deal with the issue.

>> More Articles in the News 10:

Students will be able to use mobile phones, but in a limited way (illustration)
 Students will be able to use mobile phones, but in a limited way (illustration)   Photo: shutterstock 

According to the Ministry of Education's future plans, which have already been assimilated into many schools, pedagogic use will be made of the same phones, for example the use of flight mode or three students using one mobile device. However, the efficiency of using cell phones in this way is unclear. The Ministry of Education hopes that they will be able to receive new health opinions, which will allow more free use of mobile devices.

The Pedagogical Secretariat at the Ministry of Education has already prepared many programs for the use of mobile phones, programs that will be given to the younger generation so that the name will be used as a learning tool for everything - just like a board and chalk or notebook and pen. Despite the importance of the subject in the eyes of the Ministry of Education, it will enter its share in the coming school year only partially.


Tuesday, August 29, 2017

New and improved RF Protection Color Baseball Hat for EHS people

First look - Our new and improved RF Protection Color Baseball hat with Larger Head High and Velcro size adjustment on the back, all with our S240 durable RF Blocking fabric and in beautiful new colors.
All for only $35 including delivery to most of the world.

















Saturday, August 5, 2017

Searching for a low EMF house in Israel - Mission impossible

In the last month we have been searching for a new house in Israel.
The requirements ,as far as EMF is concerned, is that the RF radiation level inside the house will be lower than 0.0007 mW/m2, and in the streed lower than 0.04 mW/m2.
The ELF levels requirements is that the levels in side the house will not be higher than 1.5mG at pick time, and that most of the time will be lower.
I am using my CORNET ED88T and the TRI FIELD 100XE for measurements.
We have seen about 20 houses so far. All of them  had RF equipment inside, so I needed to try and understand what is coming from inside and what from out side.
We liked one house the most, and I returned to it every time I was in the neighborhood to see how the contraction is going and to test the levels. The RF levels in side the house are fine but not perfect (you can't find prefect, right?). Some RF protection will be needed on the windows and joint walls. The ELF levels seemed fine at first, lower than 1 mG at worst. It is summer time here in Israel and most people and kids are at home with air condition working. This is considered high pick times. So I thought the house was cleared for ELF. But then , on the fifth time I cam to measure it, I saw the ELF levels reach 3.5mG (peak levels no RMS) on the Y Axis of the CORNET ED88T.
This was a big turn off on the house.
We were very disappointed.
But this is exactly why we EHS people must test our living environment, or soon to be living environments , before we buy/rent/move/staying in it.
In my current EHS condition, 3mG (or 3.5mG) will not kill me, but will cause me fatigue and short temper, maybe even some pain.
For example, at the time I am writing these lines, it is Saturday morning, and the levels in my current home are around 1.5mG at the living rooms and 2.5 in the bedrooms (that are closer to the electric line on the street). It is bearable , but I would like to be exposed to lower levels in my next house.
I will continue to run tests on the candidate house in order to see what are the ELF levels during different hours and different days, and in order to understand more about the exposure there, but for now, this house is going back to the end of the list (of houses that we want).
Finding a place to live for EHS is becoming harder and harder at this time or excessive wireless devices and infrastructure use. I hope we will find on little "white spot" for us to live in.

Please see the following links:
How to find a low EMF house - http://www.norad4u.com/emr-reduction/find-low-emf-house



Thursday, July 27, 2017

New study by Dr Hagay Levin - Sperm Quality in in western world is in decline in last 40 years

About the study :
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-40719743?SThisFB
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-07/thuo-css072017.php
http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-study-sounds-alarm-as-sperm-count-halved-in-western-men/

New study by Dr Hagay Levin, review about 185 studies that were published between 1971 and  2011, shows that Sperm Quality in in western world is in decline in last 40 years.
The Study was done in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem with the Haddasa Hospital, and the Mount Sinai hospital in New York.
The results show a 52.4% decline in sperm concentration and 59.3% decline in total sperm count in men from North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand  While in South America, Asia and Africa, there was no significant decline (much less studies are available on these regions).
The researchers say that low sperm quality have been linked with exposure to chemicals used in pesticides and plastics, obesity, smoking, stress, diet, and even watching too much TV.

Since Dr Hagay Levin do not say any thing about EMF radiation exposure and low sperm quality I will bring several studies that do:

  1. Wireless laptop influence on human sperm -
     http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(11)02678-1/abstract
  2. WIFI radiation damage reproduction organs in adults  -
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22465825
  3. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. -
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915130
  4. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study -
    https://www.clevelandclinic.org/reproductiveresearchcenter/docs/agradoc239.pdf
  5. Cancer in Korean War Navy Technicians: Mortality Survey after 40 Years -
    http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/net/ViewEntry.aspx?EntryId=2281363
  6. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats -
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19578660?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2
  7. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. -
    http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/early/2016/09/06/REP-16-0126.full.pdf

Picture from - https://pixabay.com/en/sperm-egg-fertilization-sex-cell-956481




Friday, July 21, 2017

CH10 Israeli TV - Report about EMF radiation sources at home

Yesterday (20/07/2017), at 21:00 on CH10, Israeli TV, a very long TV report was aired about EMF radiation sources and exposure.
The report was done by "Osot Heshbon" (translated close to "Making Calculation"), Linoy Bar Gefen and Sivan Klingbill. In it three professional EMF survey tester (2 of them I personally know, Liran Raz and Daniel Shvartzberg) showed the radiation levels (both RF and ELF) near home applainces and other sources.  The Reported also interview Prof' Sigal Sidesky (Head of Tnuda) and the head of Radiation and noise department at the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Prof Stelian Gelberg.

The report made very big noise in the web.
Discussions over it still continues.
I think it has brought awarness to more people.
I hope this awareness will bring some change in how people use appliances and how the public see and understand the possible risk of EMF exposure.

Link to Hebrew video - http://10tv.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=1256272

Bellow pictures from the TV  report






Friday, July 14, 2017

Detailed Review of 2016 EHS exposure study

The following study "Effects of personalised exposure on self-rated electromagnetic hypersensitivity and sensibility – A double-blind randomised controlled trial" (http://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.cc/science/article/pii/S016041201630931X) was aimed to face the criticism of older exposure studies and to once and for all test if EHS people can feel the exposure.
The study result was that overall subject could not identify the exposure in "better than chance" ratio (see section 3.2 in the full study).

About the study

  1. The study concluded of 42 subjects.
  2. The subjects were given 4 questionnaires, one as baseline, second in the home visit before the exposure, third after the exposures (after the outcomes were shown to the subjects), forth as a follow up after 2 months and the fifth as a follow up after 4 months.
  3. In these questionnaires they were asked about their symptoms, level of sensitivity, certainty of being sensible/sensitive to EMF, and certainty of reacting to EMF within minutes. 
  4. Each subject was asked which type of radiation, and at what level he will be able to detect in few minutes (problem - there was no object way to know this exposure was the best to be used). 
  5. Exposures types were:  GSM 900, GSM 1800, DECT, UMTS (2100-2170), WIFI , 50Hz sine wave ELF magnetic field + four other different types of other signals in other frequencies to simulate "Dirty Electricity".
  6. Minimum level of RF was 0.2 V/m and the maximum was 6V/m.
  7. Minimum level of ELF was 0.2 uT, and the maximum was 6.6uT.
  8. 4 subjects chose ELF, other chose different types of RF.
  9. The first exposure was an open exposure to make sure that the subject can sense the radiation. 
  10. Followed by 10 sessions of Exposure+rest time(for recovery), each cycle lasting not more than 15 minutes. all cycles took not more than 150 minutes (problem - rest time is not long enough).
  11. In each session/cycle the subject was ask to guess if there is exposure or not. As soon as he concluded the guess, the resting time began (problem - it is a subjective guessing game, no physiological measurements were done on the subjects to conclude if their body reacted to the radiation or not).  
  12. 3 to 7 out of the exposures cycles were real, other were sham exposure. 
  13. Subjects were tooled that at least one of the cycle will be real exposure. 
  14. After the testing was concluded, the results were shown to the subjects and he was given a Quaternary again. 
  15. 39 subjects out of 42 were tested at home. The other 3 in a place of there selection (problem no reference EMF measurements were done in the testing environment).
  16. In order for a subject to be titled as "sensible" he needed to identify if real exposure of sham in at least 8 out of 10 cycles. Only 2 out of subjects were able to achieve this. 
  17. The study was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW)


In comparison with older studies, this one is better in the following ways:

1. The trails were done in a place that the subjects felt comfortable in, so no EMF rich lab and no exposure during traveling to this lab.
2. The exposure was aimed to be to a radiation type the subject is most reactive to (we will explain what went wrong there). 

But this does not mean it is a good study.

Following are what I see as problems in this study:

  1. No Physical measurements - None of the tests included physical measurements, the subjects were only asked if they feel or sense the radiation or not.
  2. Not enough recovery time -  The researchers estimate that a Max duration  of 15 minutes will be enough time for exposure and then to recover after the exposure. 10 double blinded exposure+rest cycles were done one after the other. Each cycle consisted of exposure+rest(recovery) time, not more than 15 minutes for each cycle . Most EHS people I know will not be able to fully recover after only 15 minutes(the max possible in this study) recovery time after exposure.
  3. Wrong estimation that EHS people can sense the radiation - The researchers estimate that the subjects, which are EHS people, had the ability to "sense" the radiation after few seconds or minutes.  This assumption is wrong as most EHS people can't sense the radiation. Most EHS feel bad when exposed, sometime after few minutes, sometimes after few hours, and the recovery time is usually longer then few minutes. 
  4. Exposure type was determinate with no real tests(by....asking) - In order to determine what was the type of radiation a subject is the most reactive to, the researchers asked the subject (!). They then exposed each subject in an open session where he could see he is being exposed. If the subject said he can sense the radiation they concluded that this is the best type of exposure for him. This was concluded without physical measurements and in an open session when the subject could see he is being exposed. 
  5. Radiation levels in the test environments were not measured - The environments in which the exposure test were done, was not tested and verified to be with no radiation other than the planed exposures. 
  6. Suspicion for unbalanced approach, expecting the subject to fail - The researchers devoted a big side of the study to see if and how the subjects' conception of their EHS condition changed after they were shown the results of the exposure tests. This is a question of a psychological nature and may suggest an an-balanced approach of the researchers (It feels like the researchers weer expecting the subjects to fail the tests, this can have influenced the design and execution of the study).

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

New Testing procedure for RF radiation in schools in Israel

The new test procedure is far than perfect, but might be a small step forward.
It is far from perfect but may be a small step forward as it advice to use MAX Value measurements, to scan the class, to measure several places where student sit, to use the WIFI system under load and to use meters that can cover the frequency higher than 5GHz.
It still uses a ICNIPR based heat only standard, using MAX Values is only a recommendation and the meters are low sampling rate meters.

Proper Disclosure

It is possible that to same extent I had some influence on the new test procedure for RF radiation in schools that was released this year. Last year Prof Stelian Gelberg, the head of radiation and noise department in the Israeli ministry of environment protection, asked my to help guide two students for first degree in Public health as they were analyzing the existing procedure, determining the week points and improving it to a new test procedure.  I meet with them several times, I explained the problems, what can be done and what should be done. We also did some testing together and a long.
The new testing procedure might relay on their work.

Old Procedure

For the past few years, myself and other activists, have been criticizing the way RF tests were done in schools (after WIFI systems were installed - low duty cycle) using the test procedure that was meant to RF radiation from cellphone tower (high duty cycle signal), using very slow sampling rate meters (2-5 samplings per seconds), using the meters in Average mode, and doing the tests only in several points, usually next to the router.
These tests usually showed no radiation at all, a prof that there were not done correctly.

First look at the new procedure

First look at the new test procedure I can note few improvements but there is still a long way to go.

Improvements:


  1. There is a recommendation to use MAX value setting on the meter (not Average).
  2. The tests should be done in several points in the classroom where students sit. 
  3. The test should start with background RF testing.
  4. The tests should be done while the WIFI network should have heavy traffic. 
  5. The meters' frequency band must cover the frequency off all sources in the class, including 5GHz WIFI routers.

Still problematic:

  1. Using the meter in MAX Value setting is not a must, only a recommendation.
  2. In every point in which the tester will see high values, he is required to Average them (which is the best way to bring the numbers down).
  3. The outcomes of the tests are then compared to a ICNIRP based standard (will give the OK to every outcome, even if in Bio-active level). 
  4. There is no direction on the test procedure to use high sampling rate meters (I don't think there are any approved meter that have high sampling rate) which is a key issue when measuring low duty cycle signal as WIFI.
  5. There is no attention to the students' use of cell phones in the class. If such a use is permitted, the radiation from the cell phones should also be measured while active and transmitting.

What now?

The Environment Protection ministry should be congratulated on the steps done, and I will continue to criticize it for the problematic issues that still need to be addressed. Meanwhile we wait for the first test reports done by the new test procedure. 

In the picture, the new test procedure, in Blue the new steps

Friday, July 7, 2017

Activity Summary Report 06/2017 - "No Radiation For you" - www.norad4u.com

Activity Summary Report 06/2017

"No Radiation For you"


Hello readers, activists and EHS people.
Please see below the summary report of my activities in the sites and blogs I manage in the fields or EMF and EHS.

Main events in last month



English blog - http://norad4u.blogspot.co.il/ (since 2008)

New posts


Statistics
06/2017 - More than 1728 views

Main site -www.norad4u.com (since 2010)

New pages

Pages that were updated

Statistics :

06/2017- 2803 visits, 4222 pageviews

For EHS By EHS site – www.4EHSByEHS.com (since 2012)

This site offers special items for EHS people that will enable them to improve their quality of life.

New Pages:

Page that were updated:

  1. Minor updates and changes
  2. Inventory updates
  3. Share buttons were moved to the upper part of each page.

Statistics

06/2017- 1113 visits, 2895 pageviews


YouTube channel - http://www.youtube.com/NoRadBlog (since 2009)

New clips

  1. RF Radiation from active  GPS antenna- https://youtu.be/85yf96bamX4
  2. RF Radiation from a in car Bluetooth hand-free device - Hebrew -  https://youtu.be/cgq82cM75Z0
  3. - https://youtu.be/puLsyrWNzcI
    RF Radiation from a in car Bluetooth hand-free device    
  4. Amir Borenstein, an EHS person living at home, TV article - https://youtu.be/187KfluE2aY

Statistics

06/2017 - 6315 views in all videos.

Hebrew info site – www.Norad4u.co.il (since 2010)

  • 3 new pages
  • 6 pages were updated

Statistics

06/2017 - 3492 visits, 5899 Pageviews


Hebrew eStore site – www.4EHSByEHS.co.il (since 2013)

New Hebrew site was created for the eStore.
  • 1  new pages were created
  • No changes to other page

Statistics

06/2017 - 503 visits, 1022 Pageviews


Hebrew blog - http://norad4uh.blogspot.co.il/  (since 2006)

The hebrew blog was moved to  a new platform, from Tapuz to Blogger.
  • 5 new posts

Views:
06/2017 -New Blog more than 1341,  Old Block - more than 1438 views


The End!
Thanks for reading and see you next time!
Amir Borenstein